| Second
law lord criticises detentions at Guantanamo Bay
By Robert Verkaik, Legal Affairs Correspondent
Independent,
28 January 2004
A second law lord is to question US policy over the detention
of 660 terror suspects at
Guantanamo Bay.
Lord Hope of Craighead, one of the country's senior judges,
will tell an audience of
lawyers and academics tonight that the men are being held in
a place beyond the rule of
law without the protection of any court.
He will warn them not to let "the smiling charming faces
of our American allies divert us
from seeking to discover the reality of what is being done by
their interrogators."
Last year, Lord Steyn, another of the 12 members of the judicial
committee of the House
of Lords, spoke out against the detention when he described Guantanamo
Bay as a "
monstrous failure of justice" and the military tribunals
that will try suspects as kangaroo
courts.
His intervention was quickly seized upon by the families of
the nine British detainees
because it broke with judicial protocol that prevents judges
from making public
comments on live political issues.
Lord Hope does not go as far as Lord Steyn but he does say "it
is no understatement to
say the detainees are at the victors' mercy". In a lecture
on the history of torture, jointly
organised by international law firm Clifford Chance and Essex
University, Lord Hope
asks: "How can we expect to eliminate torture elsewhere
if there is no sure way of
knowing whether or not it has been practised at Guantanamo Bay
by the Americans?"
He adds: "We can assume that whatever has been done and
is being done to the
prisoners has and is being done with the cold and ruthless efficiency
that characterises
the actions of officials who are determined to obtain results
and whose actions are not
subjection to international inspection or to the control of any
independent judicial
authority."
He argues that people have every right to be suspicious about
the conditions under
which the detainees are being held because the outside world
has no means of testing
American assurances that "all appropriate measures" are
used in their interrogation.
Nine Britons and three British residents are among the 660 people
who have been held
at the American naval base in Cuba for more than two years without
charge or access
to lawyers.
In recent weeks the Americans signalled they are ready to repatriate
European suspects
if given assurances that they will be properly managed by the
police when they return to
their communities.
But the Home Secretary, David Blunkett, has said that such restrictions
would have to
comply with British law, making such a condition impossible to
enforce.
Lawyers argue that, since there is no offence with which they
could be charged,
because no admissible evidence was gathered at the time of their
capture, they would
be freed upon arrival in Britain.
|