|
I arrived at Ankara Esenboga Airport early on the morning of March
30, the day of Sandra Bakutz's trial. I had no problems at passport
control and was taken to a flat in Ankara's Mamak district where
I had a few hours' sleep before going to the trial. It was due to
start at 10:45 at Ankara's Adliye Sarayi (Palace of Justice), which
is in fact the senior court building in the country. It is a large,
ugly, dirty brown building.
I was taken to Abdi Ipekci Park, which is named after a liberal
journalist who was killed by Mehmet Ali Agca, the Turkish fascist
who later went on to shoot the late John Paul II back in 1981. The
park is a scene of free speech protests and supporters of political
prisoners have an ongoing protest there, though this is frequently
attacked by the police. In the park I met other delegation members
from Germany, also here to observe the trial, and then we went to
the nearby Adliye Sarayi.
A hundred or so people from Turkey were demonstrating in support
of Sandra, with a red banner proclaiming Free Sandra Bakutz. Other
delegation members were there from Austria, Denmark, Belgium and
Greece. One of them was Ulla Roeder, involved in dismantling a missile
in Scotland, I believe, and the subject of court action because
of it.
Some of the people from Turkey did a round dance called the halay,
and I and some delegation members joined in. Slogans were shouted,
such as We do not want EU democracy, we want justice! Turkish TV
cameras were present and I was told my
dancing efforts were shown on Turkish NTV.
There was a line of riot cops with clubs a! nd shields in
front of the Adliye Sarayi as well as a large number of plainclothes
cops nearer to us. They did not bother anyone that I could see,
possibly deterred by the foreign delegation.
Some of us, mostly delegation members, were let inside the Adliye
Sarayi after passing through a kind of X-ray machine at the door,
but after going from floor to floor in the multi-storey building
we learned that the court session had been postponed to two in the
afternoon. We went back outside, I made a couple of phone calls
and then went for a walk in central Ankara, accompanied by one of
the Turkish protesters who went with me to make sure I didn't get
lost.
After we got back, some of us (the delegation and some but not
all of the protesters from Turkey) were let into the Adliye Sarayi
after once more passing through the X-ray machine. We waited outside
the court room No.11 for about an hour and then were let in. The
room contained us, police and a few Turkish journalists. Like all
Turkish courtrooms, it had a copy of Kemal Ataturk's de! ath
mask attached to the wall behind the judges and prosecutor. Then
the three judges, the prosecutor and a few court personnel came
in. Sandra's defence lawyers had come into the court with the delegation.
Next Sandra was brought in, accompanied by four gendarmes in green
uniforms and berets and what appeared to be a woman prison officer.
Sandra smiled at people she recognised in the audience.
Then the proceedings started. Sandra had an official court translator,
though her Turkish is good. The charge was that she was a member
of the "illegal leftist terror organisation DHKP-C", a
charge she denied. The prosecutor said she was involved in a November
2000 protest in Brussels blamed on the DHKP-C when the then Turkish
Foreign Minister Ismail Cem visited the European Parliament. The
prosecution used as evidence an article in the mass circulation
Turkish newspaper Hurriyet, though Sandra was not mentioned in the
article. The prosecution claimed she was in a photo accompanying
the article, but Sandra denied this.
The prosecutor al so said she must be DHKP-C because she had been
on a committee supporting Ilhan Yelkuvan, a Turkish prisoner held
in Germany who went on hunger strike early in 2000 to protest against
the solitary confinement he was subjected to. Yelkuvan was accused
of being a leading member of DHKP-C and Sandra campaigning for him
was for the prosecutor evidence that she too was DHKP-C.
The prosecutor said that Belgian Interpol had described Sandra
as a member of DHKP-C but he did not expand on this.
In 2001, the Turkish authorities issued an arrest order against
her, but this was not communicated to Sandra, nor was any attempt
made to extradite her - they simply executed it when she arrived
in the country this February to attend a mass trial in Istanbul.
In a statement Sandra read out, she said that she had long campaigned
against the use of prison isolation and this was why she campaigned
for Ilhan Yelkuvan. As a journalist, she often came into contact
with all ki! nds of people and it was possible that she met
people the Turkish state might consider to be members of DHKP-C.
One of her lawyers then spoke, saying that protesting against Ismail
Cem in Brussels was a democratic right and not a crime, and that
even if it was a crime, it happened on Belgian soil and was a matter
for the Belgian authorities, who took no action against her. In
fact, there was no proof she was even there. Her support of Ilhan
Yelkuvan was likewise a matter for the German government, not the
Turkish, even if it was a crime to support him, which it was not.
The prosecutor made a request for time to gather more evidence,
including the original of the photo in Hurriyet and pictures taken
of Sandra in prison. This was presumably to try and prove that she
was present at the protest against Ismail Cem. The judge called
a recess and the court was cleared.
We came back in. Sandra was brought in again. I waved to her and
she smiled at me. The judge said he accepted the prosecutor's request
but in the meantime Sand ra was to be released. There was some applause,
which angered the court usher who started shouting. Then the session
ended.
Later delegation members went to Ankara Central Closed Prison (Ulucanlar)
to meet her and give her some flowers. We waited two hours, and
then suddenly a police van drove fast out the gate with Sandra inside.
She just had time to wave to us before disappearing. We heard from
her lawyers that she was taken to the foreigners' cell of a police
station, prior to being taken to the airport next day to go back
to Austria. Sandra herself wanted to remain in Turkey for two or
three days now she had been released but the Turkish and Austrian
authorities were clearly working together to get her out of the
country as fast as possible. Although it was sad that she could
not be present at it, a celebration was held at Ankara's Basic Rights
and Freedoms Association. Delegation members were asked to sing
a song from our countries. I sang Scots Wha Hae. I decided to leave
the SSP letter signed by the MSPs with them, perhaps to use in any
future campaign needed on Sandra's behalf.
The next morning some of us went to the Austrian Embassy to try
and get Sandra permission to stay in Turkey as a free person for
a few days. The embassy said she wanted to leave Turkey and a place
on a flight to Vienna had been booked. We didn't believe this was
what Sandra wanted - it was more a case of what the Austrian Embassy
wanted. Her case had become a diplomatic hot potato burning the
hands of both the Austrian and the Turkish authorities.
I said goodbye to Turkish friends. The delegation was breaking
up as people went for their flights - mine was at 4:10 on the afternoon
of the 31st. When I got to the airport I saw a last call for an
Austrian Airlines flight to Vienna and Sandra was on this plane,
I learned later. She was brought to the airport by both the Austrian
ambassador and Turkish policemen.
I had no problems leaving the country on my own flight, returning
to London via Munich.
Sandra has another court appearance in Turkey on June 1, as the
charge against her was not quashed. I spoke to her by telephone:
she wanted to thank everyone who supported her, and was aware that
they included Scots. She said the last night in the police station
was very bad before she was taken to the airport the next day.
She only received post and solidarity messages sent to her in prison
when she was released - they had been withheld while she was in
prison.
Although no longer in a Turkish prison, Sandra will continue to
require international solidarity as long as the charge against her
is still outstanding. Solidarity and internationalism are not crimes
but clearly the Turkish authorities think they are.
A final observation about Ankara unrelated to the trial: there
were Turkish flags hanging everywhere. On Newroz (Kurdish New Year)
a couple of Kurdish youths had dragged a Turkish flag along the
ground. The Turkish state used this to whip up ! a centrally
directed campaign of chauvinism (something it often does) making
it almost compulsory to hang Turkish flags from windows or balconies.
People who do not hang out flags risk being considered enemies of
the state, especially in Ankara, the capital city and full of civil
servants and military personnel.
Afterword: Hurriyet, the biggest circulation Turkish newspaper,
accused Sandra of belonging to the DHKP-C in its April 3 edition,
though on grounds no more solid than those actually presented as
evidence in the March 30 hearing. Certainly by British standards,
the article would have been seen as denying Sandra the right to
a fair trial. Turkish newspapers often act as mouthpieces for the
police, intelligence services and the state, though of course it
is not the only country where that happens. In the Turkish cities
of Trabzon, Samsun and Sakarya, followers of the far right such
as the Grey Wolves have been attacking left-wingers over the past
two weeks who campaign for prisoners' rights. In Trabzon, a far
right mob nearly lyn ched five students. The police then arrested
the victims of the attempted lynching, accusing them of disturbing
public order.
|