|
From Irish Republican Media Newsletter,
28 May 2004
Criminalising Communities - Ruane addresses conference
Sinn Féin Spokesperson on Human Rights Caitriona
Ruane on 26 May addressed a conference at the British Parliament
in London
on the subject of the Criminalisation of Communities . Ms Ruane
traced the decades long British government policy of criminalising
the republican and nationalist community in the six counties and
recent attempts to reinvent and reinvigorate this policy through
the IMC.
The following is the text of Ms Ruane's speech.
"I welcome the opportunity to speak on this issue 'the criminalisation
of communities and the use of anti-terrorist legislation'. For
decades Irish people, whether they are republicans, nationalists
or the Irish community living in Britain have had bitter experience
of the political and securocrat agenda which has resulted in a
raft of draconian anti-human rights repressive legislation.
We have had emergency legislation in operation in both parts of
Ireland and despite the human rights and equality provisions negotiated
through the Good Friday Agreement, that legislation is not only
alive but has been, in many instances, added to. Internment without
trial, which was used overwhelmingly against the republican/nationalist
community in the North, remains on the statute book
Some 6 years on from the signing of the GFA the Emergency Powers
Act remains in place; the Terrorism Act has gone even further than
the EPA and despite minor gestures, the bulk of Britain's military
paraphernalia in the six counties, its garrison, its spy posts,
its fortifications, its loyalist death squads operating in collusion
with the crown forces, remain intact
From long experience ourselves, when groups begin to articulate
the multi-faceted problems that are the result of anti-human rights
legislation being enacted against their communities you will usually
find that those who put this legislation in place will view your
work as anti-democratic, as 'suspect' and yes, as a "conspiracy".
For many years our legitimate right to work towards Irish self-determination,
was labelled as a criminal/terrorist conspiracy. You have only
to hark back to the Thatcher era to see how the policy makers and
the securocrats embarked on a three-pronged strategy of criminalisation,
normalisation and Ulsterisation to present our struggle and in
particular the political prisoners in the H-Blocks of Long Kesh
and women in Armagh as "thugs and criminals" to get a
sense of what the establishment is about today in its treatment
of ethnic and minority communities in Britain whom it views as "suspect".
Again in our experience communities and community groups in particular
were singled out for particular discriminatory treatment and in
the 1980s and early 1990s were put through a political vetting
process known as the Hurd principles
If groups wanted state or statutory funding they had to "pass" criteria
which amounted to them having to disassociate themselves from the
popular politics of the community they served.
Fortunately, this vetting process was actively opposed by our
community but very often it came at a high cost with the loss of
9 lives at the hands of loyalist death squads and much needed social,
cultural and economic regeneration funding in disadvantaged areas
Political vetting has left its mark to this day on many community
groups as well as on the wider nationalist and republican community
where despite 30 years of so-called anti-discrimination legislation
we still have many of the top employers consistently failing to
put measures in place to ensure there is fair representation in
the workplace.
The reality is that when communities, any community, is labelled
as suspect, terrorist or different, then there are serious consequences
and serious human rights and equality consequences that will have
to be addressed and then redressed.
As republicans for the most part we were labelled by the British
establishment and by Unionists as the "enemy from within" even
before partition was official and that remains the case, to a large
degree to this day.
That is why, six years on since the Good Friday Agreement we once
again find that despite our growing democratic mandate and our
commitment to fulfilling all aspects to the agreement that we are
once again the target for further criminalisation and demonisation
by the British and Irish governments via the establishment of the
Independent Monitoring Commission.
This Commission was established outside the terms of the Good
Friday Agreement and in our view it is part and parcel of the historical
legacy of undemocratic apparatus introduced periodically over the
years The IMC is composed of securocrats and those who politically
opposed our party and it is largely aimed at singling out our party
for criticism based on securocrats sources
Of particular note in the IMC report is paragraph 8.7 which is
like something from the Hurd era in that it puts the onus on organisations
to satisfy themselves that none of their members are linked to
paramilitary groups. Where they cannot prove it, but merely suspect
it then the person must allay the suspicion. Whatever happened
to the most fundamental principle of due process i.e. the principle
of "innocent until proved guilty"?
This is one of societies most fundamental values yet if the IMC's
report is enforceable it would mean that once again the north's
courts will be used to work a sanctions system that is anti-human
rights and discriminatory on various equality grounds including,
we believe, on political and religious grounds. Indeed this serious
dilution of civil and political rights could well set precedent
in terms of a direct read across to communities elsewhere, including
here.
We have found that a consequence of this report already is that
it has given new wind to those most opposed to the potential of
change within the Good Friday Agreement The IMC report is being
interpreted as the excuse they needed to block progress across
a range of policy issues
The politics of exclusion, criminalisation and demonisation of
communities whether in Ireland, here or elsewhere is almost always
counter-productive. It inevitably aggravates the problem and long-fingers
any short to medium-term resolution
Human Rights and equality, people's basic entitlements, are almost
always damaged and denied while those in power defend the erosion
of international principles and standards in the name of "democracy" and "national
security"
This can often appear to be an uphill battle to those communities
trying to engage in a rational and reasonable debate. The key however
is simply to persist, to widen-out the debate, to seek out allies
and to build your strength."
|