'In
Britain, I have fewer rights than an animal'
By Paul Donovan, The Guardian, 29th March 2007
When the man known as 'G' fled torture in Algeria,
the UK
offered the hope of refuge. But then he was detained for three years
without
trial. Now, living under stringent bail conditions, this member of the
'Belmarsh 12' is desperate to leave the country he thought would help
him. He
talks to Paul Donovan
Lawyers Not that long ago, in a block of flats in
east London,
I had one of the strangest
conversations of my life. I sat on a chair in the block's communal
hall; the
man I had come to visit remained just inside his front door. "G" had
asked me not to come into his flat, as I had not been vetted by the
Home
Office. Had I entered, he would have been in breach of his immigration
bail and
liable to arrest.
G - whose full name cannot
be used as it might put him at risk of reprisals
- had polio as a child, and he sat in a wheelchair, an electronic tag
on one of
his matchstick-thin legs. The tag would tell a monitoring company where
he was
at any time. Inside the flat were G's wife and their baby son. Their
young
daughter was at school.
If the Home Office had its way, my visit would not
have been possible.
Thirty-seven-year-old G, who fled his native Algeria 12 years ago after
being
tortured by government forces, would long ago have gone back "home".
And then ... who knows? Earlier this year, four Algerian men with
similar
stories to G's were deported after assurances that they would not face
criminal
charges. Two have since been arrested, imprisoned and charged with
terrorist
activities. "The men lost all faith in the possibility that they would
receive any meaningful justice in the UK,"
said Amnesty International, which has called on Britain
to stop deporting terrorist suspects to Algeria
"They preferred to return to Algeria,
despite the risks they
would face."
It was in December 2001, after the passing of the
Anti-terrorism, Crime and
Security Act, that G became one of 12 foreign nationals detained in
Belmarsh prison.
Police and immigration officials arrived at 4am, and took him away on
his
crutches. "There were 15 police officers crammed into this
one-bedroomed
flat," G recalls. "They were swearing and very aggressive. My young
daughter started crying." There was no stopping at a police station to
be
interviewed - it was straight to Belmarsh. To this day, neither G nor
any of
the other detainees have been told what they are supposed to have done,
and G
has still not been questioned by police or security services. The
"Belmarsh 12" have never appeared in a normal court to answer
charges, only the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac), in
which
judges rule on cases that the Home Secretary deems to involve matters
of
national security.
G had arrived in Britain
in 1995, having fled Algeria
in fear of his life. He had a baccalaureate in mathematics and was
three years
into an engineering course when he took part in a student protest
against the
country's military rulers, who annulled elections in 1991 when it
seemed that
the Islamic Salvation Front was going to win. As a result, he was taken
into
custody by the feared Department for Information and Security (DRS). He
claims
to have been tortured for three weeks by the DRS, given electric shocks
and
beaten with sticks. Later he fled the country, spending four years in Saudi Arabia
before eventually landing at Heathrow carrying a false French passport.
What
drew him to Britain,
he says, was its famous respect for human rights. "The immigration
officer
was about to stamp my passport, but I said, 'No. I want to apply for
refugee
status.'"
After launching his asylum claim, G survived on
income support. Because of
his disability, social services found him a one-bedroomed flat, and he
began to
study at the local college of further education, taking courses in
English,
maths and electronics, picking up on his engineering training from Algeria.
He met
a woman, a French citizen of Senegalese origin. They married in 1999,
and
although his asylum claim had been turned down in 1997, this marriage
to an EU
citizen meant that in June 2001 G was granted six months residence.
It is more than five years since G was last in a
classroom or had anything
like a normal existence. "Without the arrests," he says, "I
would be studying and seeking to carry on my life." Having lived in his
flat for 12 years, however, he is a well-known figure in the area.
There are
smiles and greetings as neighbours pass the doorway.
G claims to have no idea why he was picked up. He
is a devout Muslim, praying
five times a day and attending Friday prayers at a local mosque - but
that is
hardly a crime. Perhaps, he suggests, someone in the Algerian community
sought
to profit from pointing the finger in his direction. "Some gain money
or
British passports," he says.
On his arrival at Belmarsh in 2001, G was put
together with the other
detainees in what is known as "the unit", a prison-within-a-prison
built for IRA prisoners during the Troubles. "We were kept a minimum of
22
hours in the cell and never saw the sky," says G, who did not see his
wife
for six months. "When she was finally allowed to visit, there was a
screen
and we had to communicate by phone." The then home secretary, David
Blunkett, declared that he and other detainees could not be deported to
Algeria
because
they would be tortured. "But it was apparently OK to keep us in prison
indefinitely here. In Britain,
animals have rights; I have fewer rights than an animal."
G became the first of the detainees to be granted
bail in 2004, after he had
suffered a nervous breakdown. Those first bail conditions restricted
him to the
flat for 24 hours a day. He could not even enter his small garden, and
could
only speak to his wife and their first daughter, who was then four. "I
had
to ring the tagging company [to prove I was still at home] five times
during
the day and night. For the first month, I was just happy to be out of
prison,
but as time passed, I wished I was back in prison. I needed help for my
mental
and physical state - but no doctor could come without first being
vetted by the
Home Office."
Things got a little easier in December 2004, when
the House of Lords ruled
that detention without trial was unlawful. G's bail was replaced by a
less
stringent "control order", and he was allowed out of his home for 12
hours
a day, though not to use phones or the internet. His request to return
to his
studies was denied. He still had to wear a tag. "People were frightened
to
come and talk to me because of what they saw as possible repercussions."
Then, in 2005, came the July 7 London
bombings. Although G and the other detainees had the best alibis in the
land,
having been under surveillance and tagged since leaving prison, on
August 11,
five vans of police and immigration officers arrived to take him away
again.
G was served deportation papers by immigration
officers working on behalf of
the Home Office. They declared that he was a threat to national
security and
would be deported from the country. The police vans then set off on a
long
journey to Long Lartin prison in the Midlands.
"I was put in the deportation unit with no association. There were no
cells for wheelchairs. The sink was too high. I needed help with the
toilet." At his lowest point, he tried to hang himself with wire.
"There was blood everywhere. I was nearly dead before the officers
rescued
me."
G was granted bail in October 2005. Again, the
conditions were stringent: he
would be confined to the flat 24 hours a day, with no visitors, no
phone line
and no mobile. The tag was still to be worn. And now his wife was
pregnant with
their second child and had to go into hospital with gall stones. "I was
in
the home with my daughter. I couldn't go out to get shopping or to take
her to
school," G recalls. They were only able to survive thanks to the
kindness
of a family friend, who had been vetted to visit the flat: she went
shopping
for the family and took the little girl to school. Bail conditions have
since
been relaxed, so that G can now take and pick up his daughter from
school and
go shopping within a confined area.
Five years of captivity and other restrictions
have left G desperate to
leave the UK.
"I have no rights here, it seems." Siac recently turned down his
appeal against deportation and he is now waiting to see if he is
granted
grounds to take his case to the court of appeal. Would he consider
returning to Algeria
voluntarily, as his compatriots reluctantly did earlier this year? "I
cannot," he says. "It would put my mother, father and family there in
danger. If the Home Office can find a safe country, I'll leave Britain."
The Home Office maintains that G has nothing to
worry about. After all, if
he does go back to Algeria,
he will be told how to get in touch with the British embassy. "We have
monitored those deportations very carefully and will continue to do
so,"
said a Home Office spokesman. "This has all happened, as far as we are
concerned, in accordance with international law."
But G's lawyer, Gareth Peirce, who also acted for
the four other Algerians,
says that only desperation drove them back. After years of being
treated by the
British authorities in the same way as G, they chose "a quick death
there
rather than a slow death here".
|