|
Briefing
Paper On Government Consultation SOCPA
[A]
A New Threat to the Freedom of Assembly and the Right to Protest
This October the Government
published a public consultation document ("Managing Protest Around
Parliament") on Sections 132 - 138 of the Serious Organised Crime and
Police Act (SOCPA), which ban unauthorized protest within 1km of
Parliament.
It is clear that the Government are looking to
repeal SOCPA because of the negative public perception of restrictions
on free speech around Parliament, and that this is in large part, a
result of the sustained
campaigning of activists who have refused to give up a basic right to
freedom of assembly without political intervention by the police.
Nonetheless, there are already ominous signs that
the consultation will be more spin than substance. Indeed, the first
two questions raised in the consultation document concern the
"harmonisation of powers to manage marches and assemblies" throughout
the UK. Such "harmonisation" could mean granting the police new powers
to ban public assemblies anywhere.
The danger is that the Government will be able to
score media points for repealing unnecessary and draconian legislation,
whilst in reality further tightening the screws on protest and dissent.
Protest and dissent are the lifeblood of a democratic society. And it
is through protest itself that freedoms of expression and assembly have
been fought for and established. Please take this important opportunity
to show the strength of opposition to SOCPA and that restrictions on
protest around Parliament or anywhere else are completely unacceptable.
TAKE ACTION - by 17th January
- It is vital that anyone who cares about the
right to protest in this country responds to the Government
consultation by the 17th January deadline. You can do this via email or
post - see [B] below.
- Take part in the Freedom of Assembly Day of
Action on 12 January (see [C] below).
For more info on all of the above see www.repeal-socpa.info.
[B]
RESPONDING TO THE HOME OFFICE CONSULTATION DOCUMENT - KEY POINTS
A PDF file of the Home Office consultation
document is available here: http://tinyurl.com/2ap5l6.
Responses should be emailed to:
ProtestaroundParliament@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk- or can be sent in by
post.
The three key points it raises are:
-
Whether police powers to control marches and
assemblies across the UK should be 'harmonised'.
As there are less powers in place to control
assemblies except around Parliament and other sites designated under
SOCPA), this 'harmonisation' is likely to mean that legislation would
be put in place to control assemblies in the same way that marches are
controlled (under the
Public Order Act 1986). As few as two people can constitute an
assembly. Such 'harmonisation' could lead to the police having the
power to ban, restrict or control assemblies anywhere in the UK or for
people to have to get police authorisation for simply handing out
leaflets in your high street. Over recent years, new police powers and
interpretations of public order legislation have led to an increase in
the police trying
To control dissent and free speech. There should be no new provisions
aimed at restricting or controlling free assembly and free speech put
in place.
-
Whether special provisions are needed for
static demonstrations and marches around Parliament.
The police have many powers to control such
events already – provisions under the Public Order Act, the
Terrorism Act, anti social behaviour legislation, bye-laws and others,
as well as Sessional Orders which
grant police special powers to ensure Parliament is not disrupted while
it is in session. Parliament is the focus of protest and there should
be no barriers to peaceful dissent directed towards those in power. The
restrictions on protest under SOCPA have proved unworkable and
discriminatory, they criminalise peaceful protestors and allow the
police to make political judgements on which protests need to be
controlled and they have a 'chilling effect' on free speech - when the
public perceives that freedom to protest has been restricted, people
are
less likely to try and participate even if the law does say that no
demonstration may be banned outright.
-
Whether there are any special considerations
to be taken into account around Parliament.
The history of how SOCPA came into being shows
that it was primarily drafted in order to remove Brian Haw from his 24
hour peace vigil in Parliament Square.
It could be said that issues such as security,
access to Parliament and 'equal access to the right to protest' were
only given weight in order to justify the draconian new law. SOCPA does
not address security issues or allow 'equal access to protest' and
there is other legislation in place to deal with demonstrations that
may restrict MPs' access to Parliament.
The most bare-bones response to the consultation
process would therefore call:
- For Sections 132 - 138 of SOCPA to be repealed.
- For there to be no increase in police powers to
control marches and assemblies (and so, in particular, no
"harmonisation upwards").
- For there to be no new "special provisions" for
static demonstrations and marches around Parliament.
For a more detailed analysis see the consultation
briefing document on www.repeal-socpa.info.
[C]
WE OWN THE STREETS - FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY DAY OF ACTION, 12 JANUARY
In response to continued police repression and the
Government's consultation document 'Managing Protest around Parliament'
(see [A] and [B] above) Saturday 12 January has been called as a
nationwide day of action to defend freedom of assembly (see http://tinyurl.com/yrk2kn).
If you are organising an action then please email
freeassembly@lists.riseup.net so that your event can be added into the
presswork and info@repeal-socpa.info to be added to the events listing.
A London event is already being organised:
assemble 1pm, Saturday 12th January at the top of Trafalgar Square.
Briefing
Paper On Government Consultation SOCPA.
Emma
Parliament Square Peace Campaign
for supporters of Brian Haw and the right to protest
|